Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

GPU Cloud

Lambda and CoreWeave lead GPU cloud shortlists; hyperscalers trail specialized providers by 20+ percentage points in AI model recommendations.

178 discovery queries · 316 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 178 buyer-style "GPU Cloud" queries

Google Cloud (58.4% shortlist rate) tops absolute appearances, but Lambda (53.9%) and CoreWeave (51.1%) dominate specialized GPU demand. RunPod (43.8%) and Vast.ai (41.6%) follow, while Azure (24.2%) and Oracle (25.8%) lag despite cloud platform scale. All 10 consensus brands appear across 4 models, signaling category maturity.

8%22%37%51%65%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces14%34%55%76%96%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for GPU Cloud sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Google Cloud
6/6
2Stacks
4/6
3Lambda
3/6
4Amazon Web Services
3/6
5Microsoft
2/6
1Render
4/5
2Stacks
3/5
3Google Cloud
3/5
4Parsec
2/5
5Vmware
2/5
1CoreWeave
4/4
2Lambda
4/4
3RunPod
4/4
4Vast.ai
4/4
5Google Cloud
4/4
1CoreWeave
4/4
2Lambda
4/4
3RunPod
4/4
4Google Cloud
4/4
5Vast.ai
4/4
1CoreWeave
4/4
2Lambda
4/4
3RunPod
4/4
4Vast.ai
4/4
5Google Cloud
4/4
1CoreWeave
4/4
2Google Cloud
4/4
3Lambda
3/4
4Oracle
3/4
5Vast.ai
3/4
1RunPod
4/4
2Lambda
4/4
3CoreWeave
4/4
4Vast.ai
4/4
5Google Cloud
4/4
1Google Cloud
4/4
2AWS Batch
3/4
3Oracle
2/4
4Stacks
2/4
5Swarm
1/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · gpu-cloud

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 4/100

Lambda and CoreWeave score identically high in head-to-head queries (66 and 64 vs. category median 4), with Google Cloud trailing at 60. RunPod (48) and Vast.ai (45) occupy mid-tier, while Oracle (27) and Azure (22) underperform despite hyperscaler infrastructure. Lambda's evaluation lead (66) aligns with its 48-query comparison depth.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand012243648Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 4/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across GPU Cloud prompt runs.

Vendor pages

376

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

355

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top GPU Cloud questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for GPU Cloud?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full GPU Cloud leaderboard →