AI Visibility
measured27/100
Emerging · in Web CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 325 prompts
AI Share of Voice
11%
across 325 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Web CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Pantheon is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (725 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party comparison content like “Pantheon vs. Kinsta.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-specific structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting evaluation queries) and ensure AI-crawler crawlability for the most important pages (pricing + comparisons), since schema evidence was not found in live search.
Based on audit of pantheon.io · Oct 7, 2026