AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 763 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 745 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Pabbly is visible in
4Executive summary
Pabbly is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like “How does Pabbly compare to Zapier?” and “How does Pabbly compare to Make?” because it hosts first-party comparison content (e.g., Zapier vs Pabbly Connect, Make vs Pabbly Connect). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + crawlable pricing/comparison surfaces for AI engines (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/Product+Offer), because schema crawlability is currently not verifiable from live search and is a common blocker for “How much does Pabbly cost?” and “best workflow automation software” shortlist inclusion.
Based on audit of pabbly.com · Apr 2, 2026