[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Okta
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

40

across 720 prompts

AI Share of Voice

41%

across 702 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Identity & Access Management · of 81

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
420 category
Cited75%313/420
Share of voice49%avg
Engine consensus65%of engines
Competitors41.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited17%2/12
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice20%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Okta is visible in

4
  • Identity & Access Management1 of 81→
  • Identity Provider1 of 36→
  • Cloud Security2 of 112→
  • Security3 of 107→

Executive summary

Okta is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage identity prompts because it has strong third-party authority (notably G2) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit per-user tiers. The biggest citation risk is the lack of clearly indexable first-party comparison pages for the exact competitor set (Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, OneLogin, Auth0, Keycloak), which is what unlocks the highest-intent prompts like "How does Okta compare to Microsoft Entra ID?" and "What are the best alternatives to Okta?"

Based on audit of okta.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy