[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Maze
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook

Other products from Maze

Maze58
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

49

across 657 prompts

AI Share of Voice

48%

across 637 prompts

Category Visibility

#163

in Feedback Management · of 288

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
563 category
Cited46%261/563
Share of voice42%avg
Engine consensus49%of engines
Competitors7.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited77%10/13
Share of voice77%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Maze is visible in

6
  • UI/UX Design4 of 156→
  • Prototyping13 of 120→
  • Product Analytics42 of 91→
  • Product Experience42 of 143→
  • Customer Experience77 of 268→

Executive summary

Maze is a B2B user research SaaS with strong primary review authority (112 G2 reviews at 4.5★ per your pre-verified context) and it already has first-party comparison pages like “Maze vs. UserTesting” and “Maze vs. Lyssna,” which directly supports evaluation-stage queries. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + crawlable pricing/comparison content for AI evaluation queries (especially “How much does Maze cost?” and “What is the best user research tools software?”) so AI engines can reliably cite Maze for shortlist and pricing answers.

Based on audit of maze.co · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy