Other products from Maze
AI Visibility
measured29/100
Emerging · in Feedback Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 656 prompts
AI Share of Voice
48%
across 636 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Feedback Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Maze is visible in
6Executive summary
Maze is a B2B user research SaaS with strong primary review authority (112 G2 reviews at 4.5★ per your pre-verified context) and it already has first-party comparison pages like “Maze vs. UserTesting” and “Maze vs. Lyssna,” which directly supports evaluation-stage queries. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + crawlable pricing/comparison content for AI evaluation queries (especially “How much does Maze cost?” and “What is the best user research tools software?”) so AI engines can reliably cite Maze for shortlist and pricing answers.
Based on audit of maze.co · Apr 2, 2026