AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 334 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 316 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Maropost is visible in
2Executive summary
Maropost is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong third-party authority (G2 reviews with a 4.3★ rating and 145 reviews) and first-party pricing plus multiple competitor comparison surfaces (e.g., Maropost vs Mailchimp and Maropost vs Klaviyo). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data + crawlability for AI evaluation pages (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for the exact evaluation queries), because that’s what most directly improves eligibility for “best marketing automation software” and “Maropost vs Klaviyo/Mailchimp/ActiveCampaign” answer blocks.
Based on audit of maropost.com · Apr 1, 2026