AI Visibility
measured45/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Chatbots
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 394 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 394 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Chatbots
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Landbot is visible in
3Executive summary
Landbot is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has substantial G2 review volume (334 reviews, 4.7/5) and publicly crawlable, tiered pricing. The biggest remaining risk for AI “shortlist” and “alternatives” queries is weaker secondary review/enterprise analyst coverage (TrustRadius only shows 7 reviews; no clear Gartner Peer Insights/analyst footprint found), which can reduce citation frequency versus top enterprise leaders.
Based on audit of landbot.io · Sep 30, 2026