AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals42/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 406 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 406 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/72
Not Visible · Ai Agents Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Humanly is visible in
3Your visibility gap
Humanly surfaces in 0/72 Ai Agents discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 72 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Humanly.io has strong B2B review authority on G2 (129 reviews, 4.8/5) and measurable case-study ROI, but it is not showing up for the highest-intent “AI agents” buyer discovery prompts (0/72 discovery). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and SSR-index first-party, use-case-specific “AI agents” pages that directly answer the gap queries (e.g., “AI agents for customer support teams”, “AI agents for lead generation”) with evaluation-ready structure and FAQPage schema.
Based on audit of humanly.io · May 18, 2026