[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Humanly
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

8

across 406 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 406 prompts

Category Visibility

#72

in Applicant Tracking · of 93

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

0/72

Not Visible · Ai Agents Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
209 category
Cited8%16/209
Share of voice7%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors4.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Humanly is visible in

3
  • Applicant Tracking73 of 93→
  • AI Agentsnot yet measured→
  • AI Chatbotsnot yet measured→

Your visibility gap

Humanly surfaces in 0/72 Ai Agents discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 72 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Humanly →

Executive summary

Humanly.io has strong B2B review authority on G2 (129 reviews, 4.8/5) and measurable case-study ROI, but it is not showing up for the highest-intent “AI agents” buyer discovery prompts (0/72 discovery). The single highest-ROI fix is to publish and SSR-index first-party, use-case-specific “AI agents” pages that directly answer the gap queries (e.g., “AI agents for customer support teams”, “AI agents for lead generation”) with evaluation-ready structure and FAQPage schema.

Based on audit of humanly.io · May 18, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy