AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 510 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 510 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Howspace is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and conversion queries because it has a strong G2 presence (13 reviews, 4.8★) and publicly crawlable pricing with seat/tier starting prices. The biggest citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while Howspace has first-party comparison content (e.g., Howspace vs LXP and Howspace vs LMS), there is no evidence (from live search) of first-party pages explicitly comparing Howspace to Cornerstone Learning or Docebo, which are required to reliably win queries like “How does Howspace compare to Cornerstone Learning?”
Based on audit of howspace.com · Oct 9, 2026