AI Visibility
measured9/100
Invisible · in UI/UX Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
14
across 822 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 822 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in UI/UX Design
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Galileo is visible in
3Executive summary
Galileo is already well-positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has first-party comparison content (e.g., Galileo vs Arize Phoenix, Galileo vs Langfuse, Galileo vs Braintrust, Galileo vs LangSmith) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation/pricing queries) and ensure Technical AEO crawlability signals (robots/llms.txt) are explicitly correct for AI crawlers, so the brand can win more “best platform” and “worth it” shortlist citations.
Based on audit of galileo.ai · Jun 3, 2026