AI Visibility
measured54/100
Frequently Cited · in Help Desk
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 1302 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 1302 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
1/194
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Help Desk
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Front is visible in
4Executive summary
front.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 seller page shows 2,495 reviews) and it publishes crawlable, tiered pricing ($25/seat/mo, $65/seat/mo, $105/seat/mo). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen Structured Data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and Technical AEO crawlability signals (robots.txt bot allowances + llms.txt presence), because schema visibility and AI crawler prioritization are currently the biggest uncertainty gaps.
Based on audit of front.com · Jul 2, 2026