[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Front
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

4

across 1289 prompts

AI Share of Voice

5%

across 1268 prompts

Category Visibility

#10

in Help Desk · of 98

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
875 category
Cited13%118/875
Share of voice5%avg
Engine consensus37%of engines
Competitors23.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
12 brand-level
Cited8%1/12
Share of voice8%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited17%1/6
Share of voice17%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited29%2/7
Share of voice29%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Front is visible in

4
  • Customer Service & Support9 of 158→
  • Help Desk10 of 98→
  • Customer Experience25 of 193→
  • Team Messagingnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Front is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 authority (4.7★ with 2,432 reviews) and first-party comparison content for at least some competitor queries (e.g., Front vs. Freshdesk). The single highest-ROI fix is to expand/ensure first-party comparison coverage for the full set of competitor prompts (Zendesk, Freshdesk, Intercom, Help Scout) and add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI can reliably extract “best platform” and “how it compares” answers.

Based on audit of front.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy