AI Visibility
measured10/100
Emerging · in Vertical SaaS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
1
across 999 prompts
AI Share of Voice
1%
across 978 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Vertical SaaS
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Fibery is visible in
9Executive summary
Fibery is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage prompts because it has 125 G2 reviews at 4.8★ (and a public, crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers). The highest-risk query pattern is the competitor-comparison set (e.g., “How does Fibery compare to ClickUp/Notion/Coda/Airtable/Jira?”) because first-party comparison coverage exists but appears fragmented (e.g., “Fibery vs. X” and older “Fibery vs. Airtable” pages) rather than a clean, indexed set of dedicated “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages for every named rival.
Based on audit of fibery.io · Apr 1, 2026