AI Visibility
measured46/100
Frequently Cited · in Marketing Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
34
across 917 prompts
AI Share of Voice
34%
across 899 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Marketing Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Drip is visible in
3Executive summary
Drip is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (473 reviews, 4.4★) and first-party comparison pages for key rivals like Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen AI-citable structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and ensure technical crawlability for pricing and comparison pages so prompts like “How much does Drip cost?” and “How does Drip compare to Klaviyo?” can be answered directly from drip.com rather than only from third parties.
Based on audit of drip.com · Apr 1, 2026