AI Visibility
measured71/100
Frequently Cited · in Identity & Access Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
53
across 575 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 575 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
Brand Accuracy
3/266
citations with inaccuracies
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Identity & Access Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Cyberark is visible in
6Executive summary
CyberArk is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (G2: 4.4/5 from 71 reviews) and enterprise analyst signals (Gartner Magic Quadrant leader messaging). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage “pricing” and structured-data visibility: first-party pricing appears to include “Call for pricing” for at least some plans, and I could not confirm SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating structured data via search.
Based on audit of cyberark.com · Aug 4, 2026