AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Data & Analytics
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 435 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 435 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Data & Analytics
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Coefficient is visible in
3Executive summary
coefficient.io is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a sizable G2 presence (174 reviews, 4.7) and public, tiered pricing ($0/$49/$99+ with a 30-day Pro trial). The highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for comparison-style prompts (e.g., ensure every /compare/* or /vs-* page is clearly brand-led and indexed) and to add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” answers.
Based on audit of coefficient.io · May 8, 2026