[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Coda
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

54

across 993 prompts

AI Share of Voice

54%

across 971 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in Document Collaboration · of 82

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
848 category
Cited52%438/848
Share of voice47%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors3.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited92%12/13
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited40%2/5
Share of voice40%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Coda is visible in

7
  • Document Collaboration6 of 82→
  • Content & Knowledge15 of 148→
  • Document Generation24 of 56→
  • Knowledge Base26 of 114→
  • Collaboration28 of 156→

Executive summary

Coda is highly likely to be cited for “best collaborative workspace software” and “alternatives to Coda” because it has strong G2 authority (489 reviews, 4.6★) and active Reddit discussion. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require crawlable, structured first-party evidence—especially “How much does Coda cost?” and “How does Coda compare to Notion/Airtable/Confluence/Trello/Asana?”—because Coda’s pricing page appears to require JavaScript to render, and structured schema signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) were not confirmed in live crawl results.

Based on audit of coda.io · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy