AI Visibility
measured56/100
Frequently Cited · in Document Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
54
across 1001 prompts
AI Share of Voice
54%
across 979 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Document Collaboration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Coda is visible in
7Executive summary
Coda is highly likely to be cited for “best collaborative workspace software” and “alternatives to Coda” because it has strong G2 authority (489 reviews, 4.6★) and active Reddit discussion. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage queries that require crawlable, structured first-party evidence—especially “How much does Coda cost?” and “How does Coda compare to Notion/Airtable/Confluence/Trello/Asana?”—because Coda’s pricing page appears to require JavaScript to render, and structured schema signals (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) were not confirmed in live crawl results.
Based on audit of coda.io · Apr 1, 2026