AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
30
across 944 prompts
AI Share of Voice
29%
across 920 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Intelligence
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Clay is visible in
3Executive summary
Clay is highly likely to be cited for category and evaluation prompts because it has strong G2 traction (190 reviews, 4.7/5) and extensive first-party FAQ content that directly answers pricing and “what is Clay” questions. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison intent—your domain shows competitor mentions and alternatives content, but live search did not surface first-party “[Clay] vs Apollo.io/ZoomInfo Sales/Lusha/Cognism/Saber” pages, so AI engines may cite competitors instead of Clay for the exact comparison queries.
Based on audit of clay.com · Apr 1, 2026