[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Clay
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

29

across 948 prompts

AI Share of Voice

28%

across 924 prompts

Category Visibility

#19

in Sales Intelligence · of 94

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
637 category
Cited35%226/637
Share of voice34%avg
Engine consensus40%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited86%12/14
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Clay is visible in

3
  • Sales Intelligence19 of 94→
  • Workflow Automation69 of 146→
  • Revenue Operations75 of 97→

Executive summary

Clay is highly likely to be cited for category and evaluation prompts because it has strong G2 traction (190 reviews, 4.7/5) and extensive first-party FAQ content that directly answers pricing and “what is Clay” questions. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison intent—your domain shows competitor mentions and alternatives content, but live search did not surface first-party “[Clay] vs Apollo.io/ZoomInfo Sales/Lusha/Cognism/Saber” pages, so AI engines may cite competitors instead of Clay for the exact comparison queries.

Based on audit of clay.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy