[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Chili Piper
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

28

across 1064 prompts

AI Share of Voice

27%

across 1044 prompts

Category Visibility

#28

in Sales Engagement · of 98

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
672 category
Cited37%249/672
Share of voice34%avg
Engine consensus44%of engines
Competitors5.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
15 brand-level
Cited93%14/15
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited50%3/6
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Chili Piper is visible in

4
  • Sales Engagement28 of 98→
  • Meeting Tools34 of 87→
  • Revenue Operations36 of 97→
  • Office & Productivity94 of 182→

Executive summary

Chili Piper is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong primary review authority (G2) and first-party comparison content for at least one key rival (Calendly). The biggest AI citation risk is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potential crawlability gaps for pricing/technical AEO signals; the single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing + evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and backed by SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema targeting the exact comparison and pricing prompts.

Based on audit of chili-piper.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy