AI Visibility
measured48/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Engagement
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
28
across 1082 prompts
AI Share of Voice
27%
across 1062 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Engagement
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Chili Piper is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong primary review authority (G2) and first-party comparison content for at least one key rival (Calendly). The biggest AI citation risk is missing/unclear structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and potential crawlability gaps for pricing/technical AEO signals; the single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing + evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and backed by SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema targeting the exact comparison and pricing prompts.
Based on audit of chili-piper.com · Apr 1, 2026