AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals57/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 312 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 312 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Boundless is a B2B Employer of Record (EOR) / Agent of Record (AOR) provider and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (27 reviews, 4.8/5) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with starting prices. The biggest risk for AI answers is evaluation-stage “comparison” queries (e.g., “Boundless vs Deel/Remote”)—you have comparison-style educational content, but no clear first-party “vs competitor” pages surfaced in search, which limits direct citation for shortlist formation.
Based on audit of boundlesshq.com · Aug 31, 2026