AI Visibility
measured16/100
Emerging · in Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals45/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 382 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 382 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Marketing
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories AVADA is visible in
3Executive summary
Avada.io is likely to be cited for Shopify/ecommerce app-style queries, but it is at high risk of under-citation for B2B evaluation prompts like "Avada vs competitor" and "Avada pricing" because first-party evaluation surfaces (vs/alternatives pages) and crawlable structured evaluation content were not found in live checks. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure indexable first-party evaluation pages ("Avada vs X" and "alternatives to Avada") and add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on those pages so AI engines can cite Avada directly during shortlist formation.
Based on audit of avada.io · Sep 1, 2026