Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Version Control

GitLab dominates AI shortlists at 70% while legacy tools Subversion and Perforce hold 35–31% niches; GitHub notably absent from dataset.

162 discovery queries · 187 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 5, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 162 buyer-style "Version Control" queries

GitLab appears in 113 of 162 prompts (69.8% shortlist rate) with 504 mentions across 5 models, scoring 72. Bitbucket and default.com trail at 49.4% and 50% respectively, while Subversion (34.6%) and Perforce TeamHub (30.9%) retain narrower footholds. AWS CodeCommit registers only 18.5% shortlist presence despite backing from Amazon's cloud ecosystem.

0%24%47%71%95%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces12%34%56%78%100%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Version Control sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1GitLab
7/7
2Default
4/7
3Bitbucket
3/7
4Subversion
1/7
5AWS CodeCommit
1/7
1GitLab
5/5
2Subversion
4/5
3Default
4/5
4Stable
2/5
1GitLab
5/5
2Default
4/5
3Subversion
3/5
4Stable
2/5
5IBM Datacap
2/5
1GitLab
5/5
2Subversion
5/5
3Bitbucket
5/5
4Default
4/5
5Perforce Helix Core
2/5
1GitLab
4/4
2AWS CodeCommit
3/4
3Default
3/4
4Subversion
3/4
5IBM Datacap
1/4
1GitLab
4/4
2Default
4/4
3Subversion
3/4
4Bitbucket
1/4
5Perforce Helix Core
1/4
1GitLab
4/4
2Default
3/4
3Bitbucket
3/4
4Subversion
1/4
5DeployHQ
1/4
1GitLab
4/4
2Default
3/4
3Imanage
2/4
4AWS CodeCommit
2/4
5IBM Datacap
1/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · version-control

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 14/100

GitLab and Bitbucket tie at 53 average evaluation score across 29 comparison queries each, well above the category median of 14. Perforce variants (Helix Core, TeamHub) score 40 across 22 queries, while Subversion manages 36 in 20 comparisons. AWS CodeCommit lags at 15 across just 8 queries, suggesting limited head-to-head traction.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07152229Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 14/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

572 citations captured across Version Control prompt runs.

Vendor pages

151

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

249

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Version Control questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Version Control?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Version Control leaderboard →