[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Assembla
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 152 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 152 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
85 category
Cited1%1/85
Share of voice1%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Assembla is visible in

1
  • Version Controlnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Assembla is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage prompts via its G2 presence (128 reviews, 4.1★) and it has publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers and a substantial FAQ block. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion/evaluation comparison queries that require first-party “[Brand] vs GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket” surfaces—your domain appears to rely more on blog-style competitor coverage than on dedicated, indexable comparison pages.

Based on audit of assembla.com · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy