AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in Version Control
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
9
across 152 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 152 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Version Control
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Assembla is already strongly cited for evaluation-stage prompts via its G2 presence (128 reviews, 4.1★) and it has publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers and a substantial FAQ block. The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion/evaluation comparison queries that require first-party “[Brand] vs GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket” surfaces—your domain appears to rely more on blog-style competitor coverage than on dedicated, indexable comparison pages.
Based on audit of assembla.com · May 20, 2026