AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 419 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 419 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
ZoomShift has strong AI-citation inputs from third-party B2B review platforms (notably G2) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-active-member tiers. The biggest AI-visibility risk is evaluation-stage citation: the site appears to lack first-party, brand-led comparison surfaces and likely lacks SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data that AI engines use for “vs/alternatives/pricing” answers.
Based on audit of zoomshift.com · Oct 6, 2026