AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 593 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 593 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
xenia.team is a B2B SaaS (frontline/multi-location operations execution) and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (including a public G2 reviews page and a G2 compare page against SafetyCulture). The biggest risk to being cited for evaluation-stage queries is missing/unclear enterprise analyst + structured-data coverage (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/robots.txt verification), so the highest-ROI fix is to ensure crawlable structured evaluation content (FAQPage + SoftwareApplication) and confirm AI crawler access via robots.txt.
Based on audit of xenia.team · May 7, 2026