AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals51/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 751 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 751 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Applicant Tracking Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Workstream is visible in
3Your visibility gap
Workstream surfaces in 0/80 Applicant Tracking discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Workstream.us has strong B2B citation foundations (notably G2 presence and a public, crawlable pricing page), but it is still unlikely to be cited for applicant-tracking evaluation queries because its first-party content does not clearly target the specific buyer intents behind “enterprise/remote hiring applicant tracking” discovery prompts. Highest-ROI fix: publish and index a dedicated applicant-tracking hub (with SSR FAQ + comparison pages) that directly answers the gap queries: “how to improve candidate experience with applicant tracking” and “top applicant tracking systems for enterprise organizations/remote hiring.”
Based on audit of workstream.us · Aug 31, 2026