AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Note-Taking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 301 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 301 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Note-Taking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Workflowy is visible in
2Executive summary
Workflowy is likely to be cited by AI engines for general productivity/outliner queries (strong Wikipedia presence and active Reddit discussions), but it’s weaker for B2B-style evaluation queries like “Workflowy pricing” and “Workflowy vs [competitor]” because there’s no clear evidence of first-party evaluation/comparison surfaces or crawlable structured evaluation markup. Highest-ROI fix: add/ensure crawlable, first-party evaluation content (FAQPage + comparison pages that clearly recommend Workflowy) and implement SoftwareApplication/Offer structured data on pricing/product pages.
Based on audit of workflowy.com · Oct 9, 2026