[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Workday Talent Management
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

78

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

10

across 236 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 216 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
209 category
Cited10%20/209
Share of voice8%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited15%2/13
Share of voice15%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited38%3/8
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice33%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Workday Talent Management is visible in

3
  • HRIS67 of 106→
  • Learning Managementnot yet measured→
  • Performance Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Workday is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for enterprise Core HR evaluation because it has strong primary review authority on G2 (1464 reviews, 4.1★) and strong enterprise social proof on LinkedIn (1,345,874 followers). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure first-party, crawlable evaluation/comparison content exists for the exact competitor prompts (Workday vs SAP SuccessFactors/UKG Pro/Oracle PeopleSoft/Dayforce/ADP Workforce Now) and that pricing is crawlable with specific tiers (not gated/JS-only).

Based on audit of workday.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy