AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Sales Intelligence
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 396 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 396 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Intelligence
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Windfall is visible in
3Executive summary
Windfall is strongly cited for evaluation-stage queries via G2 (56 reviews, 4.8★) and appears in G2 comparison surfaces like “Windfall vs iWave.” The single highest-ROI fix is to add/restore first-party, crawlable evaluation content on windfalldata.com (or ensure it’s SSR on the canonical domain) for “How does Windfall compare to iWave?” and “How does Windfall compare to DonorSearch?” so AI engines can cite Windfall directly for comparison and alternatives prompts.
Based on audit of windfalldata.com · Oct 7, 2026