AI Visibility
measured24/100
Emerging · in Customer Experience
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 1033 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 1033 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Customer Experience
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Whova is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has very strong G2 presence (1871 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party comparison content for key rivals (e.g., Whova vs Webex Events & Webinars). The single highest-ROI fix is to make pricing and evaluation pages more AI-crawlable for “How much does Whova cost?” and “Is Whova worth it for mid-market event organizations?” by adding crawlable tier/pricing details (not quote-gated) and strengthening structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) on those pages.
Based on audit of whova.com · May 7, 2026