AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Live Chat
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals69/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 752 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 752 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Live Chat
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Wati is already highly citable for evaluation-stage queries because it has 514 G2 reviews at 4.6★ and first-party comparison/pricing surfaces (including a Wati vs Respond.io page and a pricing-comparison page). The biggest remaining AI-citation risk is conversion-stage precision: ensure the pricing page is fully crawlable/SSR for all key tiers and add/expand FAQPage-style evaluation Q&A targeting “How much does Wati cost?” and “Is Wati worth it for small to mid-market businesses?”
Based on audit of wati.io · Oct 4, 2026