AI Visibility
measured43/100
Frequently Cited · in Scheduling & Calendar
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals2/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
49
across 571 prompts
AI Share of Voice
49%
across 571 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Scheduling & Calendar
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
venue.live shows meaningful AI-citation potential for evaluation-stage queries because it has a G2 product profile with ~20–21 reviews and a 4.1/5 rating. The biggest blocker for AI engines is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage crawlability: the site appears to rely on demo/login flows and there is no evidence (from live search) of a publicly crawlable pricing page or first-party comparison pages.
Based on audit of venue.live · Sep 30, 2026