AI Visibility
measured63/100
Frequently Cited · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals19/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
41
across 416 prompts
AI Share of Voice
41%
across 416 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Vena Solutions is visible in
2Executive summary
Vena Solutions is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 4.5★ with 421 reviews) and active secondary review presence (TrustRadius 445 reviews). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party, crawlable evaluation content for the exact competitor-comparison prompts (e.g., “How does Vena compare to Anaplan?”) so AI can cite Vena’s own comparison pages instead of relying on third-party sources.
Based on audit of venasolutions.com · Jun 5, 2026