[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Vena Solutions
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

19

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

43

across 437 prompts

AI Share of Voice

43%

across 437 prompts

Category Visibility

#10

in FP&A · of 96

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
284 category
Cited51%144/284
Share of voice47%avg
Engine consensus76%of engines
Competitors16.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
8 brand-level
Cited88%7/8
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus81%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited75%6/8
Share of voice50%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice79%avg
Engine consensus79%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Vena Solutions is visible in

2
  • FP&A10 of 96→
  • Revenue Operationsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Vena Solutions is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2 4.5★ with 421 reviews) and active secondary review presence (TrustRadius 445 reviews). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party, crawlable evaluation content for the exact competitor-comparison prompts (e.g., “How does Vena compare to Anaplan?”) so AI can cite Vena’s own comparison pages instead of relying on third-party sources.

Based on audit of venasolutions.com · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy