AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in AI Agents
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 223 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 223 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Agents
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Typewise is visible in
3Executive summary
Typewise is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a first-party comparison hub (/compare) and a fully public, tiered pricing page with explicit per-resolution rates. The biggest remaining risk for AI engines is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating not confirmed) which can reduce eligibility for direct answers in “pricing/integrations/what is X” prompts.
Based on audit of typewise.app · Oct 7, 2026