AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Education & LMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals53/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 528 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 528 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Education & LMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TryHackMe is visible in
2Executive summary
TryHackMe is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries (e.g., “TryHackMe reviews”, “TryHackMe vs HackTheBox”) because it has first-party comparison pages and a public pricing page with specific tiers. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B SaaS structured data for SoftwareApplication/FAQPage (and ensure it’s crawlable) so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing” without relying on third-party sources.
Based on audit of tryhackme.com · Sep 1, 2026