[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Triple Whale
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

48

across 515 prompts

AI Share of Voice

48%

across 515 prompts

Category Visibility

#28

in Marketing Analytics · of 108

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
338 category
Cited54%183/338
Share of voice51%avg
Engine consensus38%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Triple Whale is visible in

2
  • Marketing Analytics28 of 108→
  • Customer Data Platformnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Triple Whale is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 presence (479 reviews, 4.5/5) and first-party evaluation content like “Triple Whale vs. Northbeam” plus a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered plans. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/verify B2B-specific structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure it’s consistently crawlable/SSR so AI Overviews can reliably extract product/pricing facts.

Based on audit of triplewhale.com · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy