AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Browser Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals49/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 346 prompts
AI Share of Voice
7%
across 346 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Browser Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Thunderbit is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Thunderbit pricing” and “Thunderbit reviews”) because it has a live G2 profile with 1 review at 5.0/5 and publicly visible pricing on both G2 and its own site. The biggest risk is category shortlist queries (“best web scraping / data extraction tools” and “alternatives to Thunderbit”) where the brand is under-supported by secondary review/analyst signals and lacks strong first-party comparison surfaces.
Based on audit of thunderbit.com · Jun 9, 2026