[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Thunderbit
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

7

across 345 prompts

AI Share of Voice

7%

across 345 prompts

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
206 category
Cited6%12/206
Share of voice6%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Thunderbit is visible in

2
  • ETL & Data Integrationnot yet measured→
  • Workflow Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Thunderbit is likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Thunderbit pricing” and “Thunderbit reviews”) because it has a live G2 profile with 1 review at 5.0/5 and publicly visible pricing on both G2 and its own site. The biggest risk is category shortlist queries (“best web scraping / data extraction tools” and “alternatives to Thunderbit”) where the brand is under-supported by secondary review/analyst signals and lacks strong first-party comparison surfaces.

Based on audit of thunderbit.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy