AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals45/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
34
across 844 prompts
AI Share of Voice
34%
across 844 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
The Org is a B2B SaaS product (org charts + sales/recruiting intelligence) with a meaningful G2 presence (23 reviews) and public, tiered pricing that AI can likely read. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage coverage: there’s evidence of first-party comparison content (e.g., “Apollo vs. The Org”), but there’s no clear, crawlable first-party “The Org vs [top competitor]” comparison surface for the core evaluation queries, and structured-data signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) were not discoverable via search.
Based on audit of theorg.com · Oct 2, 2026