AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Applicant Tracking
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals56/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
3
across 370 prompts
AI Share of Voice
3%
across 370 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Applicant Tracking
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TestDome is visible in
3Executive summary
TestDome is already well-positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (149 reviews, 4.5 rating) and first-party comparison pages like “TestDome vs HackerRank.” The highest-ROI fix is to improve crawlable conversion assets (especially pricing) and add/verify B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) so AI engines can cite pricing and evaluation answers directly from testdome.com rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of testdome.com · Oct 7, 2026