AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Accounting
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 327 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 327 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Accounting
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Tesorio is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 traction (235 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., “Tesorio versus HighRadius”). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/tesorio/reviews?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, crawlable comparison + pricing surfaces for every required competitor prompt (Invoiced, Billtrust, Quadient Accounts Receivable, VersaPay, HighRadius) and ensure pricing is publicly readable by AI crawlers (not only “See Pricing”/demo-gated).
Based on audit of tesorio.com · Jun 4, 2026