[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Tesorio
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 317 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 317 prompts

Category Visibility

#199

in Accounting · of 213

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
183 category
Cited7%13/183
Share of voice7%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Tesorio is visible in

2
  • Accounting178 of 213→
  • Revenue Operationsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Tesorio is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 traction (235 reviews, 4.7★) and first-party competitor comparison pages (e.g., “Tesorio versus HighRadius”). ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/products/tesorio/reviews?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, crawlable comparison + pricing surfaces for every required competitor prompt (Invoiced, Billtrust, Quadient Accounts Receivable, VersaPay, HighRadius) and ensure pricing is publicly readable by AI crawlers (not only “See Pricing”/demo-gated).

Based on audit of tesorio.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy