AI Visibility
measured42/100
Frequently Cited · in OKRs
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals11/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
13
across 313 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 313 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in OKRs
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Tability is likely to be cited by AI engines for OKR/goal-tracking evaluation queries because it has strong G2 presence (164 reviews, 4.6/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Tability vs Lattice). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/ratings) and ensure AI-crawlability of key pages (robots/llms.txt), since schema visibility and crawler access are currently unverified from live checks.
Based on audit of tability.io · Oct 7, 2026