AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in Hospitality & Restaurants
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 302 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 302 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Expense Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Hospitality & Restaurants
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Supy is visible in
2Your visibility gap
Supy surfaces in 0/80 Expense Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Supy has strong B2B review authority on G2 (77 reviews, 4.8/5) but is not aligned to the buyer-intent “expense management” category—its positioning is restaurant inventory/procurement—so it fails to get cited for high-value expense-management prompts like “best expense management software for startups/enterprises” and “how to streamline expense reporting.” The single highest-ROI fix is to create first-party, crawlable expense-management evaluation content (what it is, who it’s for, travel/entertainment workflows, and employee expense reporting) that matches those exact gap queries, and to add SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema so AI engines can extract it.
Based on audit of supy.io · May 7, 2026