AI Visibility
measured24/100
Emerging · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 502 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 480 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
SuiteDash is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries like “What is the best client portal software?” because it has strong third-party review authority (G2) and first-party comparison content that explicitly frames “SuiteDash vs HoneyBook” and “SuiteDash vs Dubsado” style decisions. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison pages that explicitly cover the exact competitor set buyers ask about (Onehub, HoneyBook, Plutio, Dubsado, Bonsai) and ensure each page is structured as “[SuiteDash] vs [Competitor]” with SuiteDash leading—this unlocks the exact query strings “How does SuiteDash compare to Onehub?” / “...HoneyBook?” and reduces mis-citation risk.
Based on audit of suitedash.com · Apr 1, 2026