[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Suitedash
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

10

across 502 prompts

AI Share of Voice

8%

across 480 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
240 category
Cited13%32/240
Share of voice12%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors1.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited86%12/14
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited67%4/6
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited78%7/9
Share of voice78%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Suitedash is visible in

4
  • Document Collaboration75 of 82→
  • Billing & Invoicingnot yet measured→
  • CRMnot yet measured→
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→

Executive summary

SuiteDash is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries like “What is the best client portal software?” because it has strong third-party review authority (G2) and first-party comparison content that explicitly frames “SuiteDash vs HoneyBook” and “SuiteDash vs Dubsado” style decisions. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison pages that explicitly cover the exact competitor set buyers ask about (Onehub, HoneyBook, Plutio, Dubsado, Bonsai) and ensure each page is structured as “[SuiteDash] vs [Competitor]” with SuiteDash leading—this unlocks the exact query strings “How does SuiteDash compare to Onehub?” / “...HoneyBook?” and reduces mis-citation risk.

Based on audit of suitedash.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy