[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Smartsheet
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

78

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

25

across 2024 prompts

AI Share of Voice

25%

across 2004 prompts

Category Visibility

#7

in Task Management · of 86

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1421 category
Cited31%438/1421
Share of voice27%avg
Engine consensus55%of engines
Competitors6.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited79%11/14
Share of voice79%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Smartsheet is visible in

8
  • Resource Planning1 of 135→
  • Project Management5 of 42→
  • Project Management Software6 of 131→
  • Task Management7 of 86→
  • Office & Productivity26 of 182→

Executive summary

Smartsheet is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Smartsheet pricing”, “Smartsheet vs Asana/Microsoft Project”) because it has very strong G2 review volume (21,446 reviews, 4.4/5) and visible Gartner Peer Insights presence. The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure first-party evaluation pages consistently lead with Smartsheet (and avoid competitor-vs-competitor framing) while also adding/confirming SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data on the most important comparison and pricing surfaces.

Based on audit of smartsheet.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy