AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Nonprofit Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals70/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 333 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 333 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Nonprofit Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories SlickText is visible in
2Executive summary
SlickText is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (G2: ~1,900+ reviews, 4.8/5) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., SlickText vs SimpleTexting). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage for B2B evaluation extraction (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage targeting pricing/integrations/“for X” queries) and verify it’s present across key pages, since schema signals were not confirmed in live search.
Based on audit of slicktext.com · Oct 5, 2026