AI Visibility
measured34/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
20
across 335 prompts
AI Share of Voice
20%
across 335 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Skilljar is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large, highly rated G2 profile (409 reviews, 4.6/5) plus TrustRadius and Gartner Peer Insights presence. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation pages (e.g., “Skilljar vs X” and “alternatives to Skilljar”) so AI engines can cite Skilljar directly for shortlist formation rather than relying mainly on third-party review sites.
Based on audit of skilljar.com · Oct 7, 2026