AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in Office & Productivity
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals1/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
7
across 463 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 447 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Office & Productivity
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Scrivener is visible in
1Executive summary
literatureandlatte.com is likely to be cited for “what is Scrivener / how to use Scrivener” style queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., G2 shows 87 reviews at 4.5/5) and clear first-party product pages with FAQs and pricing. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-style queries that require structured, machine-readable product metadata (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/price schema) and first-party comparison pages; the site has pricing and FAQs, but no evidence of SoftwareApplication/structured product schema was found in live search.
Based on audit of literatureandlatte.com · Aug 30, 2026