AI Visibility
measured35/100
Emerging · in Meeting Tools
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 579 prompts
AI Share of Voice
13%
across 557 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Meeting Tools
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Savvycal is visible in
2Executive summary
SavvyCal is highly likely to be cited for category shortlists because it has a strong G2 presence (36 reviews, 4.8/5) and publicly crawlable pricing ($12/user/month Basic, $20/user/month Premium). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: while SavvyCal has competitor-focused pages (e.g., “Acuity alternative”, “TidyCal alternative”), there is no clear evidence of first-party “[Brand] vs [Competitor]” pages for the exact prompts like “How does SavvyCal compare to Calendly?” and “How does SavvyCal compare to Acuity Scheduling?”. Highest-ROI fix: create/ensure indexed first-party comparison pages that explicitly answer “How does SavvyCal compare to Calendly?” and “How does SavvyCal compare to Acuity Scheduling?” with crawlable, schema-supported evaluation blocks.
Based on audit of savvycal.com · Apr 1, 2026