[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sage Intacct
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

62

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

83

across 718 prompts

AI Share of Voice

84%

across 702 prompts

Category Visibility

#10

in ERP · of 73

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
500 category
Cited82%410/500
Share of voice77%avg
Engine consensus59%of engines
Competitors4.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited60%3/5
Share of voice60%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sage Intacct is visible in

2
  • Accounting5 of 213→
  • ERP10 of 73→

Executive summary

Sage Intacct is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 and TrustRadius) and clear product positioning on its homepage. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation surfaces on sageintacct.com (especially pricing + comparison/alternatives pages) so AI can cite the brand’s own pages for “alternatives to Sage Intacct” and “Sage Intacct pricing” rather than relying on third parties.

Based on audit of sageintacct.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy