AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Expense Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
84
across 767 prompts
AI Share of Voice
85%
across 751 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Expense Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sage Intacct is visible in
2Executive summary
Sage Intacct is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 and TrustRadius) and clear product positioning on its homepage. The single highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure crawlable first-party evaluation surfaces on sageintacct.com (especially pricing + comparison/alternatives pages) so AI can cite the brand’s own pages for “alternatives to Sage Intacct” and “Sage Intacct pricing” rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of sageintacct.com · Jun 4, 2026