AI Visibility
measured58/100
Frequently Cited · in Construction Software
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals68/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 441 prompts
AI Share of Voice
10%
across 423 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Construction Software
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Sage is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for mid-market accounting/financial management evaluation queries because it has strong G2 presence (4.3★ with 4111 reviews per your pre-verified context) plus first-party comparison-style pages like “Sage Intacct vs NetSuite” and crawlable pricing pages (e.g., Sage Intacct pricing). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) and ensure evaluation-intent pages are fully schema-complete, because current web checks did not surface SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating markup on sage.com.
Based on audit of sage.com · Apr 2, 2026