[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sage
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

59

across 955 prompts

AI Share of Voice

59%

across 937 prompts

Category Visibility

#6

in Construction Software · of 75

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
775 category
Cited57%443/775
Share of voice51%avg
Engine consensus43%of engines
Competitors4.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited64%7/11
Share of voice64%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited71%5/7
Share of voice71%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sage is visible in

6
  • Construction Software6 of 75→
  • Billing & Invoicing26 of 115→
  • Expense Management27 of 108→
  • Finance42 of 139→
  • FP&A45 of 96→

Executive summary

Sage is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for mid-market accounting/financial management evaluation queries because it has strong G2 presence (4.3★ with 4111 reviews per your pre-verified context) plus first-party comparison-style pages like “Sage Intacct vs NetSuite” and crawlable pricing pages (e.g., Sage Intacct pricing). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) and ensure evaluation-intent pages are fully schema-complete, because current web checks did not surface SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating markup on sage.com.

Based on audit of sage.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy