AI Visibility
measured49/100
Frequently Cited · in Hospitality & Restaurants
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals4/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 464 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 464 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Hospitality & Restaurants
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Restaurant365 is a B2B restaurant management SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (318 reviews) and Capterra (69 reviews). The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage AI answers is missing/unclear SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and limited analyst/enterprise signals (no Gartner Peer Insights/Magic Quadrant evidence found), plus pricing pages that may not be fully crawlable for AI (pricing exists, but no explicit SSR/structured pricing evidence was found). Highest-ROI fix: implement/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema across product/pricing/comparison pages and ensure AI crawlers can read the pricing tiers and comparison content.
Based on audit of restaurant365.com · May 7, 2026