[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Restaurant365
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

4

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

14

across 439 prompts

AI Share of Voice

14%

across 439 prompts

Category Visibility

#17

in Hospitality & Restaurants · of 57

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
245 category
Cited16%39/245
Share of voice14%avg
Engine consensus56%of engines
Competitors11.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Restaurant365 is visible in

3
  • Hospitality & Restaurants17 of 57→
  • Accountingnot yet measured→
  • Inventory Managementnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Restaurant365 is a B2B restaurant management SaaS and already has strong AI-citation inputs from G2 (318 reviews) and Capterra (69 reviews). The biggest risk to appearing in evaluation-stage AI answers is missing/unclear SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and limited analyst/enterprise signals (no Gartner Peer Insights/Magic Quadrant evidence found), plus pricing pages that may not be fully crawlable for AI (pricing exists, but no explicit SSR/structured pricing evidence was found). Highest-ROI fix: implement/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage schema across product/pricing/comparison pages and ensure AI crawlers can read the pricing tiers and comparison content.

Based on audit of restaurant365.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy